RD700GX versus OLD 700 - honky mids??
4 Sep 2008, 17:31Hi,
I'm new to this forum, but have been happily playing an RD700 since it came out in 2001. I am not super-picky about piano patches: I don't own a sampler or workstation or even any SRX cards. I use my keyboard for worship music services and events, for recreational solo piano, and for garage/basement ban fun times with friends. My most often-used patches were St. Concert 1 (the default) and Band Piano 1 (to cut through the mix), with an occasional foray into some of the other good accoustic piano patches on that board. Anyway...
I recently purchased an RD700*GX* for my church, to be played mainly by me in our new contemporary worship service. I figured, 2 generations down the line (or 3 if you count the mysterious 750) this great board could have only gotten better, right? I ordered one without really bothering to preview them in stores. Mistake. After it was already on the way, I did play one in a Guitar Ctr., but didn't think much of the honky mids cause I figured it could be the speakers there, or something.
So I take the thing out of the box yesterday, and it is beautiful. Love the keys. Love all the features, all the detailed editing you can do. One problem: the raw material for that editing is absolute crap. Most of the piano patches on the 700GX sound like someone took the patches from the 700, turned the Mid EQ knob all the way up, and then sampled them. Am I crazy or can someone else with experience with both these boards feel my pain? [For reference, I'm playing through the same KC500 that I use for my old 700, in the same room, near side-by-side comparison.]
I spent a good chunk of today fiddling with the 4-band EQ, trying to turn "Expressive Grand" into something I can actually stand to play. Superior Grand is not superior, and Ultimate Grand is ultimately horrible. I cut 800 Hz and 1600 Hz and that gets rid of most of the offensive honky tinny mids, but it still doesn't sound *good*.
I have always been a fan of Roland ever since I played the RD600 at a worship leader workshop once and though "I need to get one of these" - I soon got the 700. I just don't understand how they could take some of the best piano sounds around and totally mess them up before putting them on a sweet keyboard with phenomenal features for a stage piano in the GX. I really want to like this thing! All the other sounds are as good or better than their predecessors, and the realfeel keys are great, etc.
If anyone has any editing or other suggestions, I'm listening =) I feel dumb for having us buy this keyboard and now being disappointed with it. Maybe I should run out and buy an expensive EQ unit that can make tighter and more accurate notches... but I shouldn't have to do that just to get good piano sounds out of a top of the line digital piano! What happened to the good samples from RDs past?
I'm new to this forum, but have been happily playing an RD700 since it came out in 2001. I am not super-picky about piano patches: I don't own a sampler or workstation or even any SRX cards. I use my keyboard for worship music services and events, for recreational solo piano, and for garage/basement ban fun times with friends. My most often-used patches were St. Concert 1 (the default) and Band Piano 1 (to cut through the mix), with an occasional foray into some of the other good accoustic piano patches on that board. Anyway...
I recently purchased an RD700*GX* for my church, to be played mainly by me in our new contemporary worship service. I figured, 2 generations down the line (or 3 if you count the mysterious 750) this great board could have only gotten better, right? I ordered one without really bothering to preview them in stores. Mistake. After it was already on the way, I did play one in a Guitar Ctr., but didn't think much of the honky mids cause I figured it could be the speakers there, or something.
So I take the thing out of the box yesterday, and it is beautiful. Love the keys. Love all the features, all the detailed editing you can do. One problem: the raw material for that editing is absolute crap. Most of the piano patches on the 700GX sound like someone took the patches from the 700, turned the Mid EQ knob all the way up, and then sampled them. Am I crazy or can someone else with experience with both these boards feel my pain? [For reference, I'm playing through the same KC500 that I use for my old 700, in the same room, near side-by-side comparison.]
I spent a good chunk of today fiddling with the 4-band EQ, trying to turn "Expressive Grand" into something I can actually stand to play. Superior Grand is not superior, and Ultimate Grand is ultimately horrible. I cut 800 Hz and 1600 Hz and that gets rid of most of the offensive honky tinny mids, but it still doesn't sound *good*.
I have always been a fan of Roland ever since I played the RD600 at a worship leader workshop once and though "I need to get one of these" - I soon got the 700. I just don't understand how they could take some of the best piano sounds around and totally mess them up before putting them on a sweet keyboard with phenomenal features for a stage piano in the GX. I really want to like this thing! All the other sounds are as good or better than their predecessors, and the realfeel keys are great, etc.
If anyone has any editing or other suggestions, I'm listening =) I feel dumb for having us buy this keyboard and now being disappointed with it. Maybe I should run out and buy an expensive EQ unit that can make tighter and more accurate notches... but I shouldn't have to do that just to get good piano sounds out of a top of the line digital piano! What happened to the good samples from RDs past?