Artemiy: We have gone through this 10 times already, isn't it enough?
Guess not.
1. Issues should be fixed indeed, but I do not know any, and those I did find I already reported. There are no major issues I know of, really.
2. For any issue, the OFFICIAL way to complaint is to your local Roland distributor - Roland US, Roland Germany, Roland UK, etc. This forum is a good place for reports, but not the official one.
3. Things you THINK are WRONG on the G are your personal opinion and are not issues. I have my personal opinion as well. But Roland's developer team has their own vision of the product and you either like it or you sell your G.
Please stop guys, it is really boring to read all this day to day.
Quoted for truth, Art.
Jimknopf: If this issue isn't a FAT BUG, I don't know what to call a bug.
For the umpteen millionth time, sure. Let's look at what a "bug" is:
1. From a rhythm set, press PATCH twice to get to the Rhythm Pro Edit screen.
2. Press F2 (Group Down) to get to the Wave page.
3. Attempt to change the Wave Group parameter from INT to SAMP. You can't. You're
supposed to be able to, and Roland
designed it to, but it doesn't work the way
ROLAND intended it to work. You have to press ENTER, and switch the Wave Group to SAMP from the parameter list.
THIS IS A BUG.[/size]
1. Import a short MIDI file and assign it to a phrase.
2. Assign that phrase to a Rhythm Pattern Group.
3. In Rhythm Pattern Pad Mode, play the phrase. The phrase will loop from the last note in the phrase, not the end of the measure. Therefore, any rhythm patterns imported from MIDI files won't loop properly. Roland certainly did not intend this to the be the case. Therefore...
THIS IS A BUG.[/size]
The sequencer not working the way you want it to, the controllers not working in the capacity you want them to... The dozens (hundreds) of other complaints that inundate this forum...
99% OF THEM ARE NOT BUGS.[/size]
Just one of the several reasons I stopped hanging out here so often. The noise is
deafening. Art and Dan are SAINTS for putting up with this for as long as they have.
No one's saying people can't complain. No one's saying people can't be SO ANNOYING that others roll their eyes fast enough to get whiplash.
It's really simple:
1. Critics complain ad nauseam about bugs that aren't bugs, while others find that while the implementation may not be perfect, it's imminently more usable than the competition.
2. Potential workstation buyers visit this forum and see nothing but "BUGS, BUGS, BUGS, BUGS, BUGS" (again, when 90% of the complaints are absolutely, positively, not bugs).
3. Sales for the Fantom-G drop.
4. Roland decides the damage has already been done, gives up on the G, and decides instead to focus its resources on something with a much higher profit margin, like a new V-Accordion or home organ.
Thanks a lot, guys.
Sometimes I wonder if you guys really think any of this helps. It's like you think the Japanese engineers only visit this place every six months and translate only the top three threads into Japanese:
"Oh no! We have to start yet another bitch thread because they might translate—gasp!—one that's helpful or—for shame!—marginally positive!"
Or you think Dan has a clipboard in his office and he can't forward your issues to Japan unless each issue has 3,000 checkmarks:
"Whoa. 'No cool ARX boards' is up to 2,970 mentions on Fantomized. Better dust off my old email computer!"
So who's worse? Those who enjoy what the Fantom-G gives them and work around any deficiencies—or those who spend all their music making time whining like little girls...
...when whining makes only serves to impact sales, and therefore,
shorten the development cycle of the product they whine about?
Please, whine away, but
do it correctly, through the correct channels. PLEASE. I want my Fantom-G 2.0.
If anything, YOU GUYS are the reason the Fantom-G isn't getting the support you want.[/size] You're certainly the reason I don't answer questions here anymore.