juno g orjuno di
10 Nov 2009, 21:45soundwise am i looking at the same machine? i dont need the sequencer or sampler but could really use the extra 500 bucks. will i be sacrificingmuch soundwise if i go with the di?
JUNO-Di
juno g orjuno di
Re: juno g orjuno di
11 Nov 2009, 09:30About soundwise, I think they are the same 128 poly and 64Mbytes ROM, no master fx, and compressor for Di (but who needs that if you don't need sequencer)
Juno-Di is good to add to your sound library!
Juno-Di is good to add to your sound library!
Re: juno g orjuno di
11 Nov 2009, 09:33If you don't need sampling and sequencing, apart from the display there is not much difference between the G and the Di, with an exception that on the Di there is a vocoder. Don't hesitate 
Re: juno g orjuno di
11 Nov 2009, 09:34If you don't need the sequencer.., then the Di's the one to go with here. Very close in sounds.., ROM on both is 64 mb's, both have 4 osc synth engines, ect. Plus you can save some money 
Re: juno g orjuno di
26 Nov 2009, 09:01Re: juno g orjuno di
26 Nov 2009, 09:01I played the g and di, theres no real difference except for basic workstation setups and a terribly designed interface. Go with the Di, the sounds are magnificant and well worth your money. My only plight is that the keys are poorly designed.
Re: juno g orjuno di
26 Nov 2009, 11:48a terribly designed interface.
as opposed to what product?
as opposed to what product?
Re: juno g orjuno di
26 Nov 2009, 17:22What do you expect with $700 or less? real piano key? 10 years ago, $1000 you couldn't get a keyboard. Ask people here, how much did they pay for their JUNO-6?
Re: juno g orjuno di
27 Nov 2009, 11:02I paid 300 for my xp-60 ten years ago and it has better keys.I also got a kurz last year for 700 and it has real keys. obviously you havent ventured away from Roland and thats just being a fanboy.and I mean opposed to any Korg or Kurz. Thats all I have to say.
Post edited by administrator
Post edited by administrator
Re: juno g orjuno di
28 Nov 2009, 12:23stupid fanboy
this forum was better when it had moderators
this forum was better when it had moderators
Re: juno g orjuno di
28 Nov 2009, 12:32raccoon:
In the past, we had much fewer posts, but now this isn't the case. Do you expect us to read each and every post? This is physically impossible. Why wouldn't you report offensive posts to us yourself? See that "Contact" link above?
Anagnorisis:
Please be careful with words like that, this is an official warning.
In the past, we had much fewer posts, but now this isn't the case. Do you expect us to read each and every post? This is physically impossible. Why wouldn't you report offensive posts to us yourself? See that "Contact" link above?
Anagnorisis:
Please be careful with words like that, this is an official warning.
Re: juno g orjuno di
28 Nov 2009, 15:22Children, children, let's not get off topic. It may be there are better keybeds out there. The thing is, not everyone is a bloody pianist with fingers to match, nor do I recall it being in list of concerns OP had.
One point to make, the difference in price btwn the Juno G and Di is far less than $500 and noone mentioned the availability of SRX expansion in the G.
One point to make, the difference in price btwn the Juno G and Di is far less than $500 and noone mentioned the availability of SRX expansion in the G.
Re: juno g orjuno di
28 Nov 2009, 17:56the juno-di lacks a full16-part performance mode. i think.
Re: juno g orjuno di
28 Nov 2009, 18:14Actually the Juno-Di does have a full 16 part performance mode. Using the synth by itself you get 16 parts with 2 MFX. Using it with the software editor you can gain another MFX bringing the total up to 3 MFX per performance set.