Fantom-G

New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

25 May 2011, 06:15
Hi,

Do you think Roland will release a new Workstation during 2011 ?

The Jupiter 80 is NOT a workstation, and the 'Fantom G' has been around for quite some time.

Is it too far fetched to see a new state-of-the-art Roland Workstation in 2011 ?

Any guesses.

Cheers,

Muziksculp

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

25 May 2011, 07:19
Is it too far fetched
Yupe!!

After 10 years of fantom roland does not have the ware of it all to produce a better workstation..
and even if they did.. things have move on now and roland have been so backward in their support for the existing one that a new workstation would not have the impact the G could have had.. was it supported fully in the first place..

Even kronos for all its bells and whistles is still no better than the G or just adding a laptop.

only another month to go for Namm 2011...
But hey dont hold your breath and dont be in a hurry to purchase another workstation
its not worth the wait..



[img]http://www.geocities.com/cpmul/myconfig.jpg[/img] - [img]http://forums.rolandclan.info/pub/attach/116700-UT.jpg[/img] - [img]http://www.geocities.com/cpmul/filesystem.jpg[/img]






Listen to GlassSlipper


X-Bugs.org

Results not Excuses

My Setup

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

25 May 2011, 10:00
The fantom G hardware seriously surpasses the firmware and so Roland do not need a new workstation, they need a dose of customer respect and maximise the potential of the current platform..
Last edited by Mystic38 on 25 May 2011, 21:32, edited 1 time in total.

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

25 May 2011, 13:18
There is still some room for improvement in the G, mostly on the ADC side. That said, I totally agree that they need to address the software/firmware from their customers perspective.

I am still firmly in the camp that a capable workstation is complimentary to your computer DAW. However, it needs to meet minimum specs for audio recording to make the experience seemless. If they could truly push the boundaries of interface and workflow, I know there is still a market that would be extremely excited about this.

The question is can they actually do it affordably?

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

25 May 2011, 20:22
There is still some room for improvement in the G
The G has the potential to far exceed its current status as a workstation both in software and hardware..
the problem is not the G the problem is roland..

The current architecture is solid and there is massive room for expanding its capabilities
the problem right now is roland did`nt keep the iron hot for long enough..
It would be nice to see roland do a massive revamp but it appears they prefer to put new idea`s in to new box`s rather than develop current hardware.
and of course sales play a big part too..
if the sales have droped then they have missed the boat..
the next stage for the G could potentially be an ARX +software upgrade to push the G`s limits even further.
the question is.. will that potential ever be tapped?
I dont believe it will.
but the last strike will be Namm 2011 after that its close the book on a potentialy great workstation.



[img]http://www.geocities.com/cpmul/myconfig.jpg[/img] - [img]http://forums.rolandclan.info/pub/attach/116700-UT.jpg[/img] - [img]http://www.geocities.com/cpmul/filesystem.jpg[/img]






Listen to GlassSlipper


X-Bugs.org

Results not Excuses

My Setup

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

25 May 2011, 21:25
Sweetwater Sound is the acid test for cutting edge equipment. As soon as gear is outmoded, they drop it like a hot rock. The G series is still on their site and in their catalog.

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

25 May 2011, 22:20
Well i dont mind either way..
Im in the process of giving the G a killer transformation.. :)

More coming Soon!!! (watch out for the New Topic)



[img]http://www.geocities.com/cpmul/myconfig.jpg[/img] - [img]http://forums.rolandclan.info/pub/attach/116700-UT.jpg[/img] - [img]http://www.geocities.com/cpmul/filesystem.jpg[/img]






Listen to GlassSlipper


X-Bugs.org

Results not Excuses

My Setup

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

26 May 2011, 01:11
Let me preface this by saying that I love Roland instruments; most of my rig is comprised of Roland. But, while everyone talks about the potential of the Fantom G, the harsh reality is that Roland has made a decision to focus its attention elsewhere. There have been quite a few users here that love the G but still feel that the X has features that SHOULD have been retained in the G. I agree with that assessment. ARX could have been something game changing to borrow a phrase from Korg. It has not changed anything. Imagine however if Roland would have done an ARX card that incorporated the best of SRX and took that concept to its full potential. Roland would rule the workstation market. Instead, Roland chooses to release ARX EP. Even better, with ARX Roland could have created a piano to rival the best in the business. Remember that at one time, the Ultimate Grand in the X was critically acclaimed.

There is a computer analogy that fits here. Please understand my friends that I am not dissing the G. I AM dissing Roland. The computer analogy is the Commodore Amiga. In its time there was NO computer that could touch it. Few people realize for instance that ALL of the visual effects for Babylon 5 including the ship models were accomplished on the Amiga with the Video Toaster plug in. While PC users were dealing with CGA and VGA, the Amiga was light years ahead. It was a true hardware mulitasking machine that had astounding potential. But who killed the Amiga? Quite simply it was Commodore itself. At the time, Commodore made the dreadful mistake of trying to take Apple head on by competing in what was then known as desktop publishing. But the Amiga's real strength did not lie in that less computer intensive activity. Its stength was the powerful graphics and sound capabilities. The best 3D programs like Imagine, Real 3D, and others were on the Amiga. IBM and Apple users simply could not access the power of these programs as well as other creative suites found on Commodore's beast. The Amiga is dead although the community is LARGE for Amiga emulation.

In essence, the G IS a fantastic workstation backed by a company that has lost its way. Roland have an AMAZING track record my friends in such instruments as the Jupiter 8, the XV series, the V-Synths, the Fantom X, and the stage pianos that people like Sir Elton John loved. Yet they had some short sighted blunders too. Roland released the Fantom FA-76 which was severely lacking compared to the Triton and the Motif ES. The Fantom S was the first serious workstation by Roland and the X was an AMAZING achievement and I cherish my X8. I was an owner of the original Fantom and really loved it but, its limitations reflected Roland's myopia. If the G is going to be able to compete with the XF and Kronos, it will be because end users will develop for it. The Jupiter 80 should be a clear sign that Roland's interest in the G has waned.

Someone mentioned Sweetwater. I LOVE Sweetwater and these guys will be brutally honest about instruments. I was wavering between acquiring the Kronos or the XF. Please bear in mind that each workstation is roughly the same price point and so the commission is roughly the same for the sales engineer. Yet my sales rep feels that Kronos is far more powerful and with a more efficient workflow than the Motif. Obviously, except for Japan, the Kronos is still vaporware. But, when one looks at the artists involved with the Kronos project, one cannot help but be impressed. Jordan Rudess, Herbie Hancock, and George Duke are to me at least analogous to the middle three of the 1927 Yankees. On the Korg forums OASYS owners are giving serious consideration to selling their very expensive OASYS for the Kronos. I think this is significant. Also, Sweetwater is a Roland dealer as well as a Yamaha, Korg, and Kurzweil dealer. The reason why they have not "dropped" the G is quite simple: the G is still Roland's flagship workstation. Sweetwater understands that the Roland name carries significant cachet and would not drop THE flagship of a major company if there was nothing to replace it. The Jupiter 80 is a synth and would not qualify although it DOES look tasty. If I didn't have a PC3, I would have jumped on the Jupiter 80 in a heart beat.

I downloaded two of the three manuals for Kronos. To say I was astounded is an understatement. The main manual weighs in at 1100 pages and guess what? The step by step tutorials are simply the best I have seen from any of the "big three."

Finally, with all due respect, to the person that stated "for all the bells and whistles of the Kronos,it is not really better than the G" I would have to ask what constitutes better? Features wise the G (and the X) cannot touch the Kronos. Synthesis wise, the G cannot touch even remotely the power of the PC3 (not the stripped down un-editable LE series). But if the G WORKS for YOU; if you are creating great music with it then your perspective on the Motif XF, the PC3XK, and Kronos will be that the G stands up to them. But, Korg just may have a real winner in this one. They need to after the obscenely priced OASYS and the distilled M3. I have not bought a Korg since the Wavestation EX. I still have it and love it although HD-1 will bring more options and I may just give my Wavestation EX to a friend that really needs a keyboard. Pardon the pun but is IS good karma.

Some people have mentioned the "superiority" of soft-synths. I think they are wonderful for studio use, but - and perhaps I am a Neo-Luydite - I do not feel that a laptop can stand the rigors of night after night real time gigs in biker bar for instance.

I decided to go for the Kronos PARTLY because I could not find a decent price for a V-Synth GT. True that the V-Synth is not a workstation, but, I believe it approaches the power of Kronos far more realistically than anything in the Fantom series. This of course is just opinion and I am under no delusion that my opinion means anything.

The people who have made the G a success are people like Artemiy. I remember getting the Tweakbook for the X and it was as if the X was a new instrument. I have heard G users say the same about the G Tweakbook. But the G is no longer the buzz as is XF and Kronos. Roland STILL could do something revolutionary with ARX. I TRULY believe this. If they had done so, I would NOT be buying a Kronos. Maybe they will do it though. Perhaps the Kronos will be as crippled as the G was upon release. Remember the LACK of multisampling on the G??

I am not hedging my bets however. The Kronos will fit VERY nicely for my needs along with my X, XV-88, and PC3. We are virtually in June of 2011, and I would wager that IF Roland ARE going to release a new workstation, it will be late in 2012 although it COULD be unveiled at Winter NAMM.

If you are happy with the G and you are making great music with it then I am happy for you!! But we each have different needs and approaches. I have waited since the G's initial release for a reason to buy one. Roland failed ME in that respect and after almost four years, I need to look elsewhere. Kurzweil's PC3 is a bitch to program but it IS undeniably powerful. IF Roland IS going to do anything with the G it will have to be soon; it seems as though the XF and Kronos are going to be battling for market share in 2011 IMHO.

I do want to reiterate that this little rant is NOT against the G. I do think it is a splendid instrument that much like the ill-fated Amiga, will never achieve its full potential. I am quite cognizant of the fact that Roland WILL release something astounding in the next iteration and PERHAPS I will rue the purchase of a Kronos. But four years and little movement seems to speak volumes to me and as such, it is time to add a new flavor - for ME.

Final note: I REALLY like Quinnx's idea of a Fantom X mode for the G. Will it happen by Roland? Nope. But, just like the people who virtually recreated the venerable Poly-800 into a cool piece of kit, it will be end users that will breathe new life into the G. I hope that will come to fruition.

All the best,
Vlad.

PS: My kudos for what they are worth go out to the G users who have made ASTOUNDING music with this axe even when it was crippled. More power to you!!
"Turn off your mind, relax and float downstream" - John Lennon "Tomorrow Never Knows"

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

26 May 2011, 06:36
Commodore Amiga. In its time there was NO computer that could touch it. Few people realize for instance that ALL of the visual effects for Babylon 5 including the ship models were accomplished on the Amiga with the Video Toaster plug in
Ahhh... you have touch my heart! :)


yes this was the Best right back in the early eighties and even today there are things the architecture did that windows does not seem to promote which was multiple screens all of different resolutions each of which you could drag down like a window to reveal the other ... no need to set your desktop to the highest resolution just so everything would work..

and it has 4 digital voices and with Sound-tracker or X-Music.. well what more can be said..
I even ran a Mac emulator on it..
today it exists as.. winuae and is now even better than ever..

Yes roland is the modern day commodore when it comes to gear like the G..

I agree softsynths are best in the studio.. (but is that not where all creativity begins anyway)
so your power horse can be software base rather than workstation based which as I said before is far more cheaper and much more flexible.

Therefore my comparison that Kronos is not much more than the G with a computer in that respect would still be true.
There are also some key points that turn me away form kronos in favor of the G.
  • No external midi control mixer
    only 16 audio MONO tracks
    only 16 Midi tracks
Im sure it will still be useful but i would not see it as an immediate replacement for the G.



[img]http://www.geocities.com/cpmul/myconfig.jpg[/img] - [img]http://forums.rolandclan.info/pub/attach/116700-UT.jpg[/img] - [img]http://www.geocities.com/cpmul/filesystem.jpg[/img]






Listen to GlassSlipper


X-Bugs.org

Results not Excuses

My Setup

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

26 May 2011, 08:16
Vlad_7 wrote:
Perhaps the Kronos will be as crippled as the G was upon release. Remember the LACK of multisampling on the G??
I bought the Fantom G based upon what the Fantom X and MV-8800 brought to the table in terms of sampling....

I can confirm that the Kronos is not crippled. Korg really has a winner here and think it will appeal to many types of users. When the G was released it seemed like most "Live" players were raving about it and the "Studio" musicians were disappointed. "Live" guys had the gall to say that it was basically marketed to them and that it wasn't meant to be this or that (no proven to be true). The Kronos? I think everyone will be happy with this investment. In another thread, I wrote about several things that frustrated me about the G (sampling, multisampling). Kronos is right on the money. Sampling, Sample Editing, and Multisample creating are all in the same menu. An easy export places these right in User Programs ready to be tweaked with the sound engine of the HD-1. There are some things that can be improved...and based upon a menu where it lists installed options (currently empty) and a button to authorize them...my money is on solid future support.
Weapons of Mass Destruction: Nuendo 4, MPC 5K, Fantom G

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

26 May 2011, 08:27
Hi Quinnx,

I LOVE WinUAE... but I wanted to clarify something about your post that I had misread my friend. In your reply to my admittedly verbose post, I should have stated that for those who HAVE a Fantom G that I would agree that adding a laptop would be an excellent solution. For me at least however since I do not own a Fantom G for the reasons I stated, buying a G now when something clearly outpowers it in terms of very deep synthesis possibilities would not make sense. As for adding a laptop to my current rig it would not work for me again because I just simply do not want to depend upon a laptop which is an admittedly fragile piece of equipment when compared to a tank-like workstation like the X or the G for live gigs.

I would offer that Kronos is a wonderful solution for those of us who do not at this time wish to go the softsynth and laptop with controller route. Reading more of the 1100 page main Kronos manual it seems that at least for me it will work very nicely. Obviously I DO confess that I am worried about what bugs - and there WILL be bugs - will be present in the first OS of Kronos. I live in a fairly large city but the Motif is king around here followed very closely by Kurzweil. The local Guitar Center is not going to be stocking Kronos but their floor is littered with a TON of Yamahas of all flavors, one Fantom G, a few different Junos of various models, and four M3s that have not moved since release it seems. As it stands, I am purchasing a Kronos without playing it myself. I know this is a crazy thing to do, but, what I have HEARD from Kronos - admittedly in a controlled environment - sounds utterly phenomenal.

The Fantom G IS a great instrument but at the time I did not see it as being amazing enough to sell the X8 to get it. The only thing that REALLY bugs me on the X is the fact that patch effects do not transfer to performances automatically. The PC3 handles that department EXTREMELY well and believe it or not given Kurzweil's reputation for hard to learn instruments, they implemented the effects and effect chains rather intuitively. Dynamic V.A.S.T. however is only just now a year and a half after I bought the PC3 just now STARTING to made sense lol.

At the G's release I felt that the acoustic pianos really were not that much better if indeed at all than what was offered on the G. Synthesis wise, both the X and the G are VERY similar in terms of architecture so there really was nothing to gain there. But the G has a GRRREAT sequencer - in fact I think the G has the best hardware sequencer on the market today. I know the Yamaha guys would shoot me for that but I tried the Motifs - all of them - and I never felt the intuitiveness that I felt with what I played with on the G - and indeed to a certain extent the X. As you stated correctly, Kronos only has 16 midi tracks and 16 audio tracks. But, if the workflow feel intuitive I will be very happy. If it isn't, I have at least mastered the sequencer on the PC3 and will do a lot of work from it and feel that into one of the audio tracks of Kronos.

I do not mind the limitation on the 16 audio tracks on Kronos as I have gotten along very well with the 8 audio tracks on the X but the 16 track midi sequencer limitation on Kronos REALLY mystifies me. I am not certain what Korg was thinking here.

Regardless, I wanted to clarify that I had misread part of your post. I am a big fan of your posts as they are always thought provoking and I like the fact that you have no qualms about rattling the cage;)

Best,
Vlad
"Turn off your mind, relax and float downstream" - John Lennon "Tomorrow Never Knows"

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

26 May 2011, 08:39
jahrome wrote:
Vlad_7 wrote:
Perhaps the Kronos will be as crippled as the G was upon release. Remember the LACK of multisampling on the G??
I bought the Fantom G based upon what the Fantom X and MV-8800 brought to the table in terms of sampling....

I can confirm that the Kronos is not crippled. Korg really has a winner here and think it will appeal to many types of users. When the G was released it seemed like most "Live" players were raving about it and the "Studio" musicians were disappointed. "Live" guys had the gall to say that it was basically marketed to them and that it wasn't meant to be this or that (no proven to be true). The Kronos? I think everyone will be happy with this investment. In another thread, I wrote about several things that frustrated me about the G (sampling, multisampling). Kronos is right on the money. Sampling, Sample Editing, and Multisample creating are all in the same menu. An easy export places these right in User Programs ready to be tweaked with the sound engine of the HD-1. There are some things that can be improved...and based upon a menu where it lists installed options (currently empty) and a button to authorize them...my money is on solid future support.
Hey Jahrome,

Thanks for your reassurance! As I had posted here to Quinnx, this will be the first time I have bought an instrument without trying it out and with as much under the hood going on in Kronos, I was a worried a bit about how this beast will ACTUALLY deliver. For a time I was wavering between the XF and Kronos but I just cannot get into Yamahas for some strange reason. In fact, the ONLY Yamaha I have ever owned is a TG-33 which I still have. Side by side, I believed then as I do NOW that the Fantoms were simply better instruments than Yamahas - but again that is just personal opinion.

Well, by the end of June I will either be bemoaning the Kronos purchase as many had bemoaned buying the G on release, or, I will have a new monster that should provide very deep synthesis capabilities, sampling available in any mode, and a good sequencer. As for the sequencer, I am as I stated in my reply to Quinnx mystified by the 16 track limitation. I think I will scour the Korg forum and get some feedback there.

Thanks again Jahrome. This is a significant purchase for me and I confess to a bit of trepidation on buying something I have not tried. The local Guitar Center is not going to stock them - strange for a Korg dealer - so I am going on the word of Sweetwater people who HAVE tried the Kronos and are amazed by it.

Side note: I am hopeful that people will start dumping a few V-Synth GTs to buy Motif or G or Kronos. I have wanted a V-Synth for a long time but the damned thing seems SO good that I do not see many of them being sold by their owners!! LOL Ya scurvy bastards.. SELL me one cheap!!

Best,
Vlad
"Turn off your mind, relax and float downstream" - John Lennon "Tomorrow Never Knows"

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

26 May 2011, 11:19
I am not really sure what research goes into selecting different features for different products. I am assuming that the folks that manage the production of said gear know what they are doing.

Both the OASYS and Kronos have 16 track MIDI and 16 track audio tracks. Then you got the Fantom G with 128 MIDI tracks and 24 audio tracks....Motif XF 16 tracks...

Maybe research is telling them 16 tracks is acceptable in a workstation? More memory is always on the top of everyones list...but we get various results..

Kronos 2 GB of memory but only 1 GB is for user samples
Fantom G 1 GB
Motif XF 128 MB plus the option to add 2 GB of Flash Memory

Again..not sure. But I am finally happy. I have decided not to keep my Fantom G although I just brought home the Kronos. The OS is solid so far.
Weapons of Mass Destruction: Nuendo 4, MPC 5K, Fantom G

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

26 May 2011, 13:23
If Roland wanted to sell synths like hotcakes for years to come, THIS would be their model for a new an entire generation of synths:

The "I-fantom"

Partner with Apple to make the ipad2 or 3 their synth interface/display. Un-docked, have a Roland APP that would allow portable midi sequencing, recording and a scaled down synthesis engine for portable creative work. On a side note, you could sell the app to non i-fantom owners to make additional money and encourage them to buy the real thing. Think of the ability to surf the web, update your facebook all while sitting down and using your workstation at the studio, or tweeting live during a performance ON YOUR SYNTH!

Docked, the i-fantom would have a gorgeous touchscreen to mod and manipulate the synths internals that would make even oasys users jealous.

i-fantom "synth engine" would consist of:
a re-synthesis engine (think skip back sampling re-designed to create a new single voice multi-sampled wave out of a patch).
256 voice polyphony (including audio) minimum
24 bit-96Khz UNCOMPRESSED samples (at least 16GB), with one expansion slot for an additional SSD and the ability to add a USB hard drive for audio/archiving
Instrument emulator models that would add user definable "random" or preset artifacts to patches for additional realism.
waveform switching (allowing guitars to have upstroke, downstroke waves or drumstick "left" and "right" to reduce the "electronic" SP nature of instruments.
4 global effects and 2 patch effects per synth patch.

In addition to the new i-fantom synth engine, modularize each previous synth (G, X, D, Juno, etc) and sell them as upgrades. Roland would be able to make money AGAIN on their previous synths. Most power users and longtime Roland fans would gladly pay a reasonable price to have their old synths live again in front of them incorporated into their latest workstation. It would be even cooler if they allowed importing old sequence data and patches into the modules as well. I'd pay 6-800 to have EVERY roland synth at my fingertips. Additionally, the modules could be sold as VSTi's to defray the cost.

Expand the ARX concept to include fully user configurable expansion boards as well as open up the technology to 3rd party companies and developers for a mutually beneficial licensing agreement. If you don't think the on-board effects do it for you, pop in a "waves" effects ARX and whammo! Need more voices or more audio track processing power, pop in a board with more processors on it. Need more ram...etc.

To streamline hardware and development costs, they could abandon most of the proprietary hardware typically found in a workstation and use what they already have developed for the PC. Convert as much of the internals to "PC" architecture and use sonar with a few keyboard workstation mods as the sequencer. The ARX would be changed to pci-e, etc.

The problem with soft-synths is that they aren't well integrated and hard to use. Composing using a G and a soft synth/sequencer is cumbersome at best. The problem with hardware synths is they don't have the raw power or flexibility that the PC architecture can provide (from a cost standpoint). An i-fantom would arguably have the best of all worlds and position Roland to not only sell a lot of synths but allow them to capitalize on newer markets and technologies and keep the workstation alive. They could arguably use that platform for the next 10 years and only have to provide minor facade updates and beefier hardware (like apple does with the ipad/iphone).

If apple is too expensive, go for Motorola and the android platform. In any event, if Roland is listening, if you build it...they will come!

Re: New Roland Workstation during (2011) ?

26 May 2011, 13:38
There is no partnering with iAnything. In any case, if that were the game, Apple runs the show. Do you think Roland would really allow that?

I don't know why people are so keen to jump on the computer/software/subscription/upgrade boat. It's absolutely no different than the hardware you used to replace, except you're left with nothing in the end.

No, I don't think if you build it they will come. In fact, give it some time and you may see them running for the doors.

← Back to Fantom-G