Yes, I looked at the videos and I undestood some things more.
The problem is that I think that this keyboard sounds great, but it is not as powerful as the Juno-G for serious live performance. Yes, we have the two assignable buttons that are really welcome, but we have some important limitations as well:
- you can put only 4 patches in split/layer instead of 16
- no live settings mode means it is slower to select sounds during a live performance. The live settings was a great invention by Roland... something I awaited for 20 years! Now how could I come back to writing the numbers of the patches on a sheet of paper and recall them by entering the patch number? You don't know how many times I chose the wrong patch in this way... what's more, in the Gi you don't have a dedicated number pad, so you would always have to enter the numeric mode. At least the other manufacturers offer a quick way to select patches by number by providing a dedicated numeric pad. The favorite list is also not fit for the purpose, because if you have different projects you would be forced to put the favorite patches in the correct order every time and rebuild the list from scratch, what's more opening the favorite screen and selecting the patch by rotating the wheel is too slow. The Live Setting mode is FUNDAMENTAL for a live performance if you don't have a dedicated numeric pad!
Furthermore, there's not enough space to stick the patch number list on the front panel!
- no sample pads, even though I think that they could add it with a software update.
I really can't understand why they removed the live settings mode. Did they really made a keyboard oriented to live performance where there's no quick way to select patches? Also, did they really made a keyboard where the maximum number of patches you can use at the same time is limited to 4, like in the Yamaha performances, when they previously offered 16?
I think that these limitations will prevent many serious musicians (even serious amateurs, no need to be a professional) from buying the Gi... for example, I cannot upgrade: the Gi would simply not fit my setup due to the limitations above.
Let's wait for the user manual, but to me these limitations look pretty serious... a pity, because I like the concept.
Last but not least... the LCD is smaller than the one on the Juno-G... 240x64 vs 240x92,,, it's true that we were used to do full sound editing on a 2 lines 40 character LCD 10 years ago, but today... why go backwards?
Look at the Korg M50 display... it's gorgeous, with its 320x240 resolution! And we're talking of an instrument in the same class.
To be fair, it really looks that the target of the Gi is not the musician but a beginner hobbyist.