Audio Tracks Pt. II

Anyone?

Pretty sure the quality is no better than Fan-X ... Roland didn't make any changes to the samper section with G ... Also, how can you really take these audio tracks seriously since they don't allow automated panning or volume changes ... It's really no better than Fan-X in that regard except for faster loading times and the "project" format ...

I'd think of the (Fan-X) and Fan-G as more scratchpad devices until the audio tracks become more robust with features .... I could never come even close to doing on the Fantom what I do in Logic ... (which isn't to say I haven't made some nice ditties on the Fantom ... )

Diametro, good deal. That's it. I'll get Logic.

Don't me wrong ... I LOVE my Fan-X ... and I imagine having the G could only be better in certain regards ... There's a great immediacy to using a workstation that's completely lost in something like Logic ... I HATE USING LOGIC ... However, to get that super hands-on micro sound sculpting level, you need a computer.

Don't discount the G or X. (However, how I'm a disappointed with the G so far is that it really isn't a true substitute for a computer DAW just as the X isn't either (though it's more understandable for that machine) ...

And remember, getting into the computer stuff is A LOT more complicated than using a Fan-G or X ...

And there's no guarantee you will get "professional" results using a computer and a myriad of interconnecting parts (DAW software, audio interface, computer) ...

Even though I'm getting more and more comfortable using Logic and getting better sounding tracks ... I think ... I still use the Fantom as a workstation and integrate that into Logic ...

Really ... Everyone, IMO, could benefit from having a good workstation and a good computer DAW ...

Good luck ...