Fantom-G

FANTOM-G VS. DAW

Re: FANTOM-G VS. DAW

19 Jun 2008, 07:29
Here are my 2 cents.

By far not all people need all the power a modern DAW offers, even a simple one like GarageBand. These can be newbie users, or those who need some relatively simple production job done quickly. Here, a Fantom-G is a perfect solution. It has everything (parts, tracks, etc.) pre-set for you, so you eliminate some time that would be needed to build that up in a DAW, plus it's an all-in-one experience with no cables (even if you have a laptop, that would be an audio interface and a MIDI keyboard, and still this is not the same thing).

It's only when you need to go deeper you'll need to get your stuff into a rather serious DAW. But 90% of people will not need this (with 22 effects processors on board... come on).

I am working with both a DAW setup on my Mac and Roland's stations, and I am not sure what I like best. GarageBand and Logic rock because of drag-and-droppable everything. But still there are steps you need to take to build a set up, which is uninspiring at times, and composing on the G may be refreshing in comparison.

As always, people can claim they need all this power and more, but WHERE IS THE MUSIC? A classic jazz trio with just drums, bass and grand piano puts almost everything we do these days to shame.

Re: FANTOM-G VS. DAW

19 Jun 2008, 08:33
If Fan-G could pan and automate audio tracks — maybe Roland programmers will give us this gift — it would be a nice start ...

I must admit, though, I HATE using a mouse ... what would actually be better would be some sort of xyz d-beam that would move the cursor/values on screen ...
Some tunes and whatnot ...

http://www.soundclick.com/bands/page_music.cfm?bandID=405125



some tunes and whatnot ...
http://www.soundclick.com/bands/pagemusic.cfm?bandID=405125

← Back to Fantom-G