GT a step too far?..
6 Feb 2008, 06:04Okay there is no denying that the Vsynth Classic is innovative
and the XT keeps true to the original but less controllers.
The GT on the upside
we have 2 V engines for twice the power potential,
AP synthesis
VC designer in paralell with the V engine
USB storage
However the GT seems to have lost the fluidity of both the classic version and the XT making it alot more work than ease to create some basic VA or pcm sounds.
Its kinda like 10 steps forward and 12 steps back..
we have MORE potential with less access
It feels more like work than pleasure to use.
Now, ok i only have it about 48 hours but the classic required no thinking and was very intuitive
It seems on the GT more effort was given to the style and the look of the machine and the OS than the actual workflow.
Im sure if I take some time to get use to its new workflow it will yield results but why does it have to be style before workflow?
and the XT keeps true to the original but less controllers.
The GT on the upside
we have 2 V engines for twice the power potential,
AP synthesis
VC designer in paralell with the V engine
USB storage
However the GT seems to have lost the fluidity of both the classic version and the XT making it alot more work than ease to create some basic VA or pcm sounds.
Its kinda like 10 steps forward and 12 steps back..
we have MORE potential with less access
It feels more like work than pleasure to use.
Now, ok i only have it about 48 hours but the classic required no thinking and was very intuitive
It seems on the GT more effort was given to the style and the look of the machine and the OS than the actual workflow.
Im sure if I take some time to get use to its new workflow it will yield results but why does it have to be style before workflow?